Table Component
The State Ethics Commission on Monday overruled an administrative law judge who found that two Republican groups with ties to the defunct First Liberty Building & Loan did not violate campaign finance laws.
The commission now appears poised to rule next month that the Georgia Republican Assembly and its affiliated political action committee failed to property disclose more than $187,000 in spending to support numerous candidates in recent years. The groups also are charged with failing to register as an independent committee and failing to file required disclosure reports.
If it finds the groups violated state law, the commission also will determine what penalties they should pay. In recent court documents, the commission sought $45,000 in civil penalties for the alleged violations.
Atlanta’s Tallest Buildings
1072 West Peachtree is poised to become Atlanta’s fifth-tallest building when it finishes construction.
The commission has long required groups that contribute to candidates and spend independently of them to register as both political action committees and as independent committees. The commission says the GRA PAC spent big money backing a variety of candidates but failed to disclose which candidates benefited from its spending. It also says the parent group Georgia Republican Assembly violated disclosure laws because it essentially controlled the PAC.
In May, the case went to a hearing before Administrative Law Judge Dominic Capraro. These judges preside over disputes between people and state agencies. Sometimes their rulings are final. But in some cases, the rulings act as recommendations to a state agency.
In a preliminary ruling last month, the judge found that neither group had violated state law. He said the GRA and its PAC did not meet the state’s definition of an independent committee.
Under state law, the ethics commission was not bound by the judge’s ruling. On Monday, Senior Assistant Attorney General Elizabeth Young argued the judge got it wrong. If left unchallenged, she said the ruling would clear the way for other groups to avoid fully reporting their expenditures and would create “an open season for dark money in the state of Georgia.”